help button home button JAMIA Hate scrolling?
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

First published April 24, 2008 as JAMIA PrePrint; doi:10.1197/jamia.M2602
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2008;15(4):424-429
© 2008 American Medical Informatics Association


A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M2602v1
15/4/424    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matheny, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Gandhi, T. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Matheny, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Gandhi, T. K.

Submitted on August 22, 2007
Accepted on March 11, 2008

A Randomized Trial of Electronic Clinical Reminders to Improve Medication Laboratory Monitoring

Michael E. Matheny MD, MS, MPH1*, Thomas D. Sequist MD, MPH2, Andrew C. Seger PharmD3, Julie M. Fiskio4, Michael Sperling5, Don Bugbee5, David W. Bates MD, MPH6, and Tejal K. Gandhi MD, MPH6

Affiliation of the authors: 1 Division of General Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Decision Systems Group, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA ; 2 Division of General Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA ; 3 Division of General Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Cambridge, MA ; 4 Division of General Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Partners HealthCare System, Boston, MA ; 5 Partners HealthCare System, Boston, MA; 6 Division of General Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Objective Recommendations for routine laboratory monitoring to reduce the risk of adverse medication events are not consistently followed. We evaluated the impact of electronic reminders delivered to primary care physicians on rates of appropriate routine medication laboratory monitoring.

Design We enrolled 303 primary care physicians caring for 1,922 patients across 20 ambulatory clinics that had at least one overdue routine laboratory test for a given medication between January and June 2004. Clinics were randomized so that physicians received either usual care or electronic reminders at the time of office visits focused on potassium, creatinine, liver function, thyroid function, and therapeutic drug levels.

Measurements Primary outcomes were the receipt of recommended laboratory monitoring within 14 days following an outpatient clinic visit. The effect of the intervention was assessed for each reminder after adjusting for clustering within clinics, as well as patient and provider characteristics.

Results Medication-laboratory monitoring non-compliance ranged from 1.6% (potassium monitoring with potassium-supplement use) to 6.3% (liver function monitoring with HMG CoA Reductase Inhibitor use). Rates of appropriate laboratory monitoring following an outpatient visit ranged from 14% (therapeutic drug levels) to 64% (potassium monitoring with potassium-sparing diuretic use). Reminders for appropriate laboratory monitoring had no impact on rates of receiving appropriate testing for creatinine, potassium, liver function, renal function, or therapeutic drug level monitoring.

Conclusion We identified high rates of appropriate laboratory monitoring, and electronic reminders did not significantly improve these monitoring rates. Future studies should focus on settings with lower baseline adherence rates and alternate drug-laboratory combinations.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 1994 by the American Medical Informatics Association.