help button home button JAMIA Hate scrolling?
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published June 25, 2008 as JAMIA PrePrint; doi:10.1197/jamia.M2629
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M2629v1
15/5/701    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bullen, C.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wells, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bullen, C.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15:701-704. DOI 10.1197/jamia.M2629.
© 2008 American Medical Informatics Association


Case Report

A Near Miss: The Importance of Context in a Public Health Informatics Project in a New Zealand Case Study

Stewart Wells, MBChB, MPH(Hons)* and Chris Bullen, MBChB, MPH(Hons)

Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Science, University of Auckland, New Zealand

* Correspondence: Dr. Stewart Wells, Department of Health Informatics, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Science, University of Auckland, PO Box 92019, Auckland, New Zealand (Email: swells{at}ihug.co.nz).

Received for publication: 09/21/07; accepted for publication: 05/28/08.

This article describes the near failure of an information technology (IT) system designed to support a government-funded, primary care–based hepatitis B screening program in New Zealand. Qualitative methods were used to collect data and construct an explanatory model. Multiple incorrect assumptions were made about participants, primary care workflows and IT capacity, software vendor user knowledge, and the health IT infrastructure. Political factors delayed system development and it was implemented untested, almost failing. An intensive rescue strategy included system modifications, relaxation of data validity rules, close engagement with software vendors, and provision of intensive on-site user support. This case study demonstrates that consideration of the social, political, technological, and health care contexts is important for successful implementation of public health informatics projects.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Medical Informatics Association.