help button home button JAMIA Bigger figures
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

First published June 25, 2008 as JAMIA PrePrint; doi:10.1197/jamia.M2207
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2008
© 2008 American Medical Informatics Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sengupta, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hripcsak, G.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sengupta, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hripcsak, G.

Submitted on July 14, 2006
Accepted on June 6, 2008

A Model for Expanded Public Health Reporting in the Context of HIPAA

Soumitra Sengupta PhD1, Neil S. Calman MD2, and George Hripcsak MD, MS1*

Affiliation of the authors: 1 Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY ; 2 Institute for Urban Family Health, New York, NY

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.

The advent of electronic medical records and health information exchange raise the possibility of expanding public health reporting to detect a broad range of clinical conditions and of monitoring the health of the public on a broad scale. Expanding public health reporting may require patient anonymity, matching records, re-identifying cases, and recording patient characteristics for localization. The privacy regulations under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) provide several mechanisms for public health surveillance, including using laws and regulations, public health activities, de-identification, research waivers , and limited data sets, and in addition, surveillance may be distributed with aggregate reporting. The appropriateness of these approaches varies with the definition of what data may be included, the requirements of the minimum necessary standard, the accounting of disclosures, and the feasibility of the approach.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 1994 by the American Medical Informatics Association.