help button home button JAMIA Hate scrolling?
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bidgood, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Van Syckle, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bidgood, W. D., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Van Syckle, D. E.
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 4:199-212 (1997)
© 1997 American Medical Informatics Association


Review

Understanding and Using DICOM, the Data Interchange Standard for Biomedical Imaging

W. Dean Bidgood, Jr., MD, MS, Steven C. Horii, MD, Fred W. Prior, PhD and Donald E. Van Syckle

Affiliations of the authors: Division of Medical Informatics, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Center for Outcomes Measurement, Duke University Medical Center, Cognitive Science Branch, Lister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communication, National Library of Medicine, United States National Institutes of Health (WDB); Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (SDH); Philips Medical Systems (FWP); Merge Technologies (DEV).

Correspondence and reprints: W. Dean Bidgood, Jr., MD, Box 3321, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710. E-mail: bidgood{at}nlm.nih.gov

Abstract The Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Standard specifies a non-proprietary data interchange protocol, digital image format, and file structure for biomedical images and image-related information. The fundamental concepts of the DICOM message protocol, services, and information objects are reviewed as background for a detailed discussion of the functionality of DICOM; the innovations and limitations of the Standard; and the impact of various DICOM features on information system users. DICOM addresses five general application areas: (1) network image management, (2) network image interpretation management, (3) network print management, (4) imaging procedure management, (5) off-line storage media management. DICOM is a complete specification of the elements required to achieve a practical level of automatic interoperability between biomedical imaging computer systems—from application layer to bit-stream encoding. The Standard is being extended and expanded in modular fashion to support new applications and incorporate new technology. An interface to other Information Systems provides for shared management of patient, procedure, and results information related to images. A Conformance Statement template enables a knowledgeable user to determine if interoperability between two implementations is possible. Knowledge of DICOM's benefits and realistic understanding of its limitations enable one to use the Standard effectively as the basis for a long term implementation strategy for image management and communications systems.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
T. Hacklander, J. Martin, and K. Kleber
Informatics in Radiology (infoRAD): An Open Source Framework for Modification and Communication of DICOM Objects
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2005; 25(6): 1709 - 1721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
Y.-R. Ng, S. Shiffman, T. J. Brosnan, J. M. Links, L. S. Beach, N. S. Judge, Y. Xu, U. V. Kelkar, and A. L. Reiss
BrainImageJ: A Java-based Framework for Interoperability in Neuroscience, with Specific Application to Neuroimaging
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2001; 8(5): 431 - 442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
C. Wang and C. E. Kahn Jr
Potential Use of Extensible Markup Language for Radiology Reporting: A Tutorial
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2000; 20(1): 287 - 293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
W. D. Bidgood Jr, B. Bray, N. Brown, A. R. Mori, K. A. Spackman, A. Golichowski, R. H. Jones, L. Korman, B. Dove, L. Hildebrand, et al.
Image Acquisition Context: Procedure Description Attributes for Clinically Relevant Indexing and Selective Retrieval of Biomedical Images
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 1999; 6(1): 61 - 75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
S. M. Huff, R. A. Rocha, C. J. McDonald, G. J. E. De Moor, T. Fiers, W. D. Bidgood Jr., A. W. Forrey, W. G. Francis, W. R. Tracy, D. Leavelle, et al.
Development of the Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes (LOINC) Vocabulary
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 1998; 5(3): 276 - 292.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
C. A. Kulikowski
Medical Imaging Informatics: Challenges of Definition and Integration
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 1997; 4(3): 252 - 253.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Medical Informatics Association.