help button home button JAMIA Bigger figures
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Frawley, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miller, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Frawley, S. J.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Vol 2, 238-242, Copyright © 1995 by American Medical Informatics Association


ARTICLES

Trade-offs in producing patient-specific recommendations from a computer-based clinical guideline: a case study

PL Miller and SJ Frawley
Center for Medical Informatics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8009, USA.

This case study explored 1) how much online clinical data is required to obtain patient-specific recommendations from a computer-based clinical practice guideline, 2) whether the availability of increasing amounts of online clinical data might allow a higher specificity of those recommendations, and 3) whether that increased specificity is necessarily desirable. The "quick reference guide" version of the guideline for acute postoperative pain management in adults, developed by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, was analyzed. Patient-specific data items that might be used to tailor the computer's output for a particular case were grouped into rough categories depending on how likely they were to be available online and how readily they might be determined from online clinical data. The patient- specific recommendations were analyzed to determine to what degree the amount of text produced depended on the online availability of different categories of data. An examination of example recommendations, however, illustrated that high specificity may not always be desirable. The study provides a concrete illustration of how the richness of online clinical data can affect patient-specific recommendations, and describes a number of related design trade-offs in converting a clinical guideline into an interactive, computer-based form.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
A H Morris
Decision support and safety of clinical environments
Qual. Saf. Health Care, March 1, 2002; 11(1): 69 - 75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. H. Morris
Developing and Implementing Computerized Protocols for Standardization of Clinical Decisions
Ann Intern Med, March 7, 2000; 132(5): 373 - 383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
M. M. Kuilboer, J. van der Lei, J. C. de Jongste, S. E. Overbeek, B. Ponsioen, and J. H. van Bemmel
Simulating an Integrated Critiquing System
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., March 1, 1998; 5(2): 194 - 202.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
K. E. Campbell, D. E. Oliver, and E. H. Shortliffe
The Unified Medical Language System: Toward a Collaborative Approach for Solving Terminologic Problems
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 1998; 5(1): 12 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
P. L. Miller
Aspects of IAIMS Implementation That Require Further Research
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., April 1, 1997; 4(2): S52 - S61.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Medical Informatics Association.