| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Report |
Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Science, University of Auckland, New Zealand
* Correspondence: Dr. Stewart Wells, Department of Health Informatics, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Science, University of Auckland, PO Box 92019, Auckland, New Zealand (Email: swells{at}ihug.co.nz).
Received for publication: 09/21/07; accepted for publication: 05/28/08.
This article describes the near failure of an information technology (IT) system designed to support a government-funded, primary care–based hepatitis B screening program in New Zealand. Qualitative methods were used to collect data and construct an explanatory model. Multiple incorrect assumptions were made about participants, primary care workflows and IT capacity, software vendor user knowledge, and the health IT infrastructure. Political factors delayed system development and it was implemented untested, almost failing. An intensive rescue strategy included system modifications, relaxation of data validity rules, close engagement with software vendors, and provision of intensive on-site user support. This case study demonstrates that consideration of the social, political, technological, and health care contexts is important for successful implementation of public health informatics projects.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |