help button home button JAMIA Hate scrolling?
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published April 24, 2008 as JAMIA PrePrint; doi:10.1197/jamia.M2561
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M2561v1
15/4/449    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turchin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Broverman, C. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Turchin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Broverman, C. A.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15:449-452. DOI 10.1197/jamia.M2561.
© 2008 American Medical Informatics Association


Implementation Brief

Evaluation of an Inpatient Computerized Medication Reconciliation System

Alexander Turchin, MD, MSa,b,d,*, Claus Hamann, MD, MSb,c,d, Jeffrey L. Schnipper, MD, MPHa,d, Erin Graydon-Baker, MS, RRTa, Sally G. Millar, RN, MBAc, Patricia C. McCarthy, PA, MHAc, Christopher M. Coley, MDc,d, Tejal K. Gandhi, MD, MPHa,d and Carol A. Broverman, PhDb

a Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
b Partners Information Systems, Wellesley, MA
c Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
d Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

* Correspondence: Alexander Turchin, MD, MS, Clinical Informatics Research and Development, Suite 201, 93 Worcester Street, Wellesley, MA 02481 (Email: aturchin{at}partners.org).

Received for publication: 07/17/07; accepted for publication: 03/24/08.

We designed the Pre-Admission Medication List (PAML) Builder medication reconciliation application and implemented it at two academic hospitals. We asked 1,714 users to complete a survey of their satisfaction with the application and analyzed factors associated with user efficiency. The survey was completed by 626 (36.5%) users. Most (64%) responders agreed that medication reconciliation improves patient care. Improvement requests included better medication information sources and propagation of medication information to order entry. Sixty-nine percent of admitting clinicians reported a typical time to build a PAML of <10 min. Decreased reported time to build a PAML was associated with reported experience with the application and ease of use but not the average number of medications on the PAML. Most users agreed that medication reconciliation improves patient care but requested tighter integration of the different stages of the medication reconciliation process. Further training may be helpful in improving user efficiency.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Medical Informatics Association.