This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Data Supplement All Versions of this Article: M2440v1 15/1/29    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wicentowski, R. Articles by Sydes, M. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wicentowski, R. Articles by Sydes, M. R.

Using Implicit Information to Identify Smoking Status in Smoke-blind Medical Discharge Summaries

^a Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA
^b MRC Clinical Trials Unit, London, England.

^_* Correspondence: Richard Wicentowski, Swarthmore College, Computer Science Department, 500 College Avenue, Swarthmore, PA 19081 (Email: richardw{at}cs.swarthmore.edu).

Received for publication: 03/16/07; accepted for publication: 10/03/07.

As part of the 2006 i2b2 NLP Shared Task, we explored two methods for determining the smoking status of patients from their hospital discharge summaries when explicit smoking terms were present and when those same terms were removed. We developed a simple keyword-based classifier to determine smoking status from de-identified hospital discharge summaries. We then developed a Naïve Bayes classifier to determine smoking status from the same records after all smoking-related words had been manually removed (the smoke-blind dataset). The performance of the Naïve Bayes classifier was compared with the performance of three human annotators on a subset of the same training dataset (n = 54) and against the evaluation dataset (n = 104 records). The rule-based classifier was able to accurately extract smoking status from hospital discharge summaries when they contained explicit smoking words. On the smoke-blind dataset, where explicit smoking cues are not available, two Naïve Bayes systems performed less well than the rule-based classifier, but similarly to three expert human annotators.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				O. Uzuner, I. Goldstein, Y. Luo, and I. Kohane Identifying Patient Smoking Status from Medical Discharge Records J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2008; 15(1): 14 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]