This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Data Supplement All Versions of this Article: M2125v1 14/3/320    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Welch, W. P. Articles by Sandy, L. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Welch, W. P. Articles by Sandy, L. G.

Electronic Health Records in Four Community Physician Practices: Impact on Quality and Cost of Care

^a UnitedHealthcare, Edina, MN
^b Center for Health Care Policy and Evaluation/Ingenix, Edina, MN
^c The Lewin Group, Falls Church, VA
^d Duval County (FL) Health Department, Jacksonville, FL.

^_* Correspondence and reprints: Dawn Bazarko, RN, MPH, UnitedHealthcare, 5901 Lincoln Drive, Edina, MN 55346 (Email: dawn_m_bazarko{at}uhc.com).

Received for publication: 04/12/06; accepted for publication: 02/09/07.

Objective: To assess the impact of the electronic health record (EHR) on cost (i.e., payments to providers) and process measures of quality of care.

Study Design: Retrospective before-after-study-control. From the database of a large managed care organization (MCO), we obtained the claims of patients from four community physician practices that implemented the EHR and from about 50 comparison practices without the EHR in the same counties. The diverse patient and practice populations were chosen to be a sample more representative of typical private practices than has previously been studied.

Measurements: For four chronic conditions, we used commercially-available software to analyze cost per episode over a year and the rate of adherence to clinical guidelines as a measure of quality.

Results: The implementation of the EHR had a modest positive impact on the quality measure of guideline adherence for hypertension and hyperlipidemia, but no significant impact for diabetes and coronary artery disease. No measurable impact on the short-term cost per episode was found. Discussions with the study practices revealed that the timing and comprehensiveness of EHR implementation varied across practices, creating an intervention variable that was heterogeneous.

Conclusions: Guideline adherence increased across practices without EHRs and slightly faster in practices with EHRs. Measuring the impact of EHRs on cost per episode was challenging, because of the difficulty of completely capturing the long-term episodic costs of a chronic condition. Few practices associated with the study MCO had implemented EHRs in any form, much less utilizing standardized protocols.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Virapongse, D. W. Bates, P. Shi, C. A. Jenter, L. A. Volk, K. Kleinman, L. Sato, and S. R. Simon Electronic Health Records and Malpractice Claims in Office Practice Arch Intern Med, November 24, 2008; 168(21): 2362 - 2367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]